Monday, June 20, 2011

THE CHAMPIONSHIPS


Wimbledon is underway!  I feel alive again.

Rafael Nadal is already through the first round with a straight sets victory over American journeyman, Michael Russell.  No major upsets so far. Other winners on the day include Monfils, Berdych, Gasquet, Wawrinka, Fish, and Raonic.

The back end of this tournament sets up very nicely once again.  If form holds, Nadal and Murray will meet in one semifinal, Djokovic and Federer in the other.  With those four playing such superb tennis, why root for upsets when we have those potential monumental matchups to look forward to...

Every tennis fan knows by now that John Isner and Nicolas Mahut will meet again in the first round tomorrow.  Highly doubtful they can recreate the insanity of last year's neverending story, but after serendipitously drawing each other again, it'll be interesting to watch no matter what.

London calling!

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

AIN'T IT GRAND


When one of the four Grand Slam tennis tournaments is taking place in the world, my life is richer.  If I'm not working, which I prefer not to do during the Majors if I can help it, I can camp out on the couch and spend a televised day in Melbourne or Paris or London or New York.  A phenomenal feature on DirecTV allows me to choose which court to watch, if the network coverage is not showing the match I want to see.  If I happen to be working during a particular Slam, my DVR makes sure I have wall-to-wall tennis waiting for me when I get home.  No matter what's going on in my life at the time, I feel busier during a Grand Slam.  There's more to do.  I feel energized, alive.

But when a Grand Slam ends, a massive canyon-sized hole is created in my world.  That sensation came over me once again yesterday, one day after the French Open concluded its annual clay soiree.  I woke up with no clay court tennis in progress.  Nothing to catch up on.  No match to anticipate later in the day. Instead, it was just a Monday.  Granted, the grass court season began right away in England, but I wasn't ready for a Wimbledon tuneup quite yet.  Although, I must say, the thought of Wimbledon just a few weeks away will make it a lot easier to get through this tough transition.  In fact, on the tennis calendar, these two Slams are by far the closest together.  Mercifully, my melancholy and misery will be short lived.  But before I go back to wallowing, let's review the thrilling events from the weekend at Roland Garros.

On Friday, Rafael Nadal took care of business with a hard-fought three-set victory over a game but overmatched Andy Murray.  Their clash was but a mere amuse bouche to an incredible meal, for later that day, Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer played an instant classic.  With the number one ranking, a ton of pride, and a shot at the title on the line, Nole and Fed put on a shotmaking show.  To watch Federer move around the court and strike the ball so cleanly, you would never know that he has been slumping this year.  You would never know that tennis folks have been beginning to mourn his inevitable decline.  Fed looked every bit the 16-time Grand Slam Champion against the hottest player on tour in Novak Djokovic, who was riding one of the great win streaks in tennis history.  Djokovic seemed to be affected by the moment.  With a four-day layoff between matches due to a walkover in the quarters, his timing was off in the first set, and Federer took full advantage.  But Nole has been playing so well, struggling through a set meant that he would force Roger to win it in a tiebreaker.  Federer kept the momentum going in the second set, Djokovic let down a bit.  Fed won the set 6-3 and took a commanding two sets to love lead.  But the Djoker has too much confidence in himself and his game these days to roll over like he may have done in the past.  He fought back, broke Roger, vigilently held serve, and took the third set 6-3.  The fourth set produced some spectacular tennis, with so much riding on the result and neither man willing to budge.  Fittingly, it came down to a tiebreaker in near darkness. If Fed won it, the match was over.  If Djoker won it, they would return to the court on Saturday morning to play a winner-takes-all fifth set.  Echoes of Federer's loss to Nadal at Wimbledon with darkness encroaching reverberated throughout Stade Roland Garros.  But Roger was up to the task this time.  He gained the advantage, withstood every effort by Nole to level the match, and won the tiebreaker before nightfall.  When Federer finally took match point, he proudly wagged one finger in the air, as if to say, "You all forgot for a second that I was the greatest, didn't you?"  And then he screamed the kind of cathartic scream that comes from prolonged periods of intensity ending in sweet relief.  The scream allowed us a rare peek behind the polished veneer and into the burning heart of the fiercest of competitors.  Federer had vanquished Djokovic.  The streak was done.  But Roger was not.

Saturday provided us with a Women's Final that may have lacked star power but was not short on intrigue.  The defending champion, Francesca Schiavone, was looking to repeat the magic that won her the title last year and prove she was no one-Slam wonder.  With the absence of Justin Henin, Schiavone has surprisingly stepped in and filled the void as the tour's clay court dame.  But Li Na (or Na Li) was not about to hand her the trophy.  After reaching the Australian Open earlier this year but falling to Kim Clijsters in her bid to become China's first Grand Slam winner, Li was motivated to make history.  Schiavone etched her name into the tennis history books by beating Sam Stosur in last year's French final, taking the first Grand Slam title for the women of Italy.  Li Na came out firing in the first set, undaunted by the magnitude of the moment.  She hit the ball harder and crisper and prevented Schiavone from finding her rhythm.  The Chinese woman secured the first set 6-4 and went up a break in the second.  Schiavone played much better tennis in the second set, getting to net as much as possible and expertly angling her volleys.  When Li Na served at 4-3, Schiavone's aggressive nature prevailed and she broke back to level the set.  The Italian then seemed to gain the momentum.  She went up 6-5.  With Li Na serving to stay in the set, an overruled line call swung Uncle Mo back to the Chinese player.  She held to force a tiebreaker.  With history on the line, she didn't blink.  In fact, she skunked Schiavone 7-love in the breaker, then fell onto her back in celebration.  The crowd showed their appreciation for the quality of the match and Li Na's tremendous achievement at 29-years-old.  She can now forever boast that she won a Grand Slam title.  And China will never forget her.

Sunday brought us another treat -- the 8th Grand Slam Final between Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. The two living legends have played in more Grand Slam Finals against each other than any duo in the history of men's tennis.  Going into the match, Rafa was 5-2 in finals against Roger.  Nadal won four meetings at the French and one at Wimbledon, Federer won two at Wimbledon.  With respect to Bjorn Borg and John McEnroe, Federer and Nadal can lay claim to the greatest rivalry ever on the men's side.  (Evert and Navratilova obviously own that distinction on the women's side.)  Nadal also needed to win the match to retain his number one ranking.  If he lost, Novak Djokovic would take the top spot in tennis away from him and Federer would take his crown.  But the sensational Spaniard would not be denied.  Though Federer played fantastic tennis to make him earn it.  Fed went up 5-2 in the first and looked good doing it.  But as he has so often in the past, Nadal flipped a switch and won the next 5 games to take the set.  Nadal went up a break in the second and served for the set.  A brief but hard rain fell from the sky and caused a delay (the first of the tournament).  When play resumed, Federer stormed back, broke Nadal, and forced a tiebreaker.  But Nadal rebounded by taking a 4-0 lead and cruising in the breaker to win the second set and go up two sets to love.  Again in the third set, Nadal went up a break.  At 4-2, it looked to be over.  But Federer dug deep into his champion heart and refused to give in.  He broke Nadal twice and won the set 7-5.  There was a glimmer of hope in the Federer camp.  But it was brief.  Nadal dominated the fourth set, breaking Roger repeatedly and closing it out 6-1.  When it was over, Rafa dropped to his knees then exchanged a warm embrace with Roger at the net.  Uncle Toni stood and screamed "Vamos!" three times.  This may have been the 6th time Nadal has won this title, but it seemed just as sweet to them as the first.  And for tennis fans, we got to experience these two magnificent players produce the kind of tennis we always wish for when they do battle.  Though the fourth set itself may have been anticlimactic, the men's final satisfyingly capped off an epic three days of tennis.

Of course, I wished I was in Paris to witness it all firsthand, but I can honestly say there was no shortage of emotion and enjoyment while watching from the comfort of my own home.  To me, there is nothing like Grand Slam tennis.  Although, to fight off depression, I'll probably tune in tonight to watch my Miami Heat go for a 3-1 lead in the NBA Finals.  I guess that'll help a little.

Friday, June 3, 2011

B'DAY ON CLAY


Rafa Nadal downs Andy Murray, 6-4, 7-5, 6-4 to reach the French Open Final.  It'll be the 6th time in 7 years he plays for the title.  Now we have to wait and see who will be across the net from him...



Yes, I'm well aware this picture is from last year, but I wanted to pay tribute to the man on his birthday. Many many more Happy Birthdays to you, Rafael Nadal.  All together... Vamos!

THE FINAL FOUR


Rafa Nadal vs. Andy Murray
Roger Federer vs. Novak Djokovic

Nadal tries to reach his 6th French Final on his 25th birthday.
Murray tries to spoil it all for Rafa.

Djokovic tries to reach #1 in the world for the first time and continue his win streak.
Federer tries to spoil it all for Nole.

The only thing that can ruin a day like this is NBC.  Because the network does not like to preempt The Today Show under any circumstance, here on the West Coast we get the French Open Men's Semifinal on tape delay.  And... we only get one match in a 3-hour window.  All tournament long, The Tennis Channel and ESPN2 have been providing wall-to-wall live coverage from Roland Garros.  But here we are at The Final Four of the French, and we only get one of the two matches, and it's on tape.  Lame.  Truly lame.  The Tennis Channel is replaying both semis immediately after NBC's coverage is over.  I think.  NBC is scheduled to show tennis from 11am-2pm and the Tennis Channel from 2pm-9pm.  But what if the one semifinal match NBC shows is an epic five-hour five-setter?  Does the Tennis Channel have to hold it's replay?  Is it possible they could both be showing the same match at the same time?  Either way, it really won't matter to me.  I'll be at work by then and there's really no way I'm going to be able to avoid seeing the results until I get home in the evening.  So, big thanks for effing up my favorite day of the French Open.  Merci beaucoup, NBC.

On my personal wish list, first and foremost, I want to see amazing tennis with all four men playing at the highest level.  I'd like to see Novak beat Roger.  I'd like to see Rafael beat Andy.  And, of course, I want to see Nadal beat Djokovic in the final on Sunday.  Thus, Nole would be the new #1 but Rafa would still be the King of Clay.

Feliz Cumpleanos, Rafa!  Vamos!

UPDATE:  The Tennis Channel is playing the Nadal-Murray match live this morning!  Thus, I say in a non-sarcastic way... Merci beaucoup, Tennis Channel.

Friday, May 27, 2011

THE BEAUTY OF THE GAME

Aranxta Rus
There exists a very real phenomenon for men watching women's tennis... We tend to root for the better looking player.  Some might call it male chauvinism, some may scream sexism.  Either way, it's the stone cold truth.  Of course, there are always exceptions.  Martina Navratilova earned legions of fans during her monumental rivalry with Chris Evert, even though Evert was clearly the babe of the pair.  However, Martina and other, shall we say, less cute girls on the tour need to become champions to garner the kind of attention given to the naturally lovely young lasses of the game.

At one end of the stunning spectrum is Anna Kournikova.  At one time, she was the top junior player in the world.  When she turned pro, the Internet went wild with photos of the Russian beauty who looked poised to rise to the top.  But she never won a single professional tournament.  Instead, she used her brief and relatively unsuccessful tennis career as a springboard into superstardom.  She modeled, she endorsed products, she sold posters.  She became a household name, nearly synonymous with the very idea of a tennis babe.  However, beauty fades, and so will Anna Kournikova from the memories of tennis fans.

The other gorgeous end of the spectrum is Maria Sharapova.  Shaza represents the perfect storm in women's tennis -- a drop dead gorgeous Grand Slam champion.  And that's why she is the highest paid female athlete in the world.  The Williams sisters, each attractive in their own right, take up the #2 and #3 slots on the same list for the same reasons -- fashionable and stylish with a trophy room full of major titles.  Over the years, young up-and-coming teenagers, think Tracy Austin and Chris Evert, have captured the imaginations and affections of the tennis-viewing public.  It's hard not to pull for the adorable girl who is fighting with all her heart.  With all apologies to accomplished players like Svetlana Kuznetsova, Amelie Mauresmo, and Nadia Petrova, when looking for a rooting interest in a tennis match, the heart wants what the heart wants.  Admittedly, that sentiment is from the point-of-view of a heterosexual male who loves the game of tennis and loves beautiful women.  I leave open the possibility that others may disagree with me on who is hot and who is not.  After all, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.  But, as spectators, we should all admit that physical appearance plays a huge part in stirring our emotions when watching two women do battle on the tennis court.

Gisela Dulko
Two of my favorite tennis beauties pulled off major upsets in the last couple of days.  Gisela Dulko, a tour veteran, knocked out last year's finalist and number 8 seed, Samantha Stosur in a three-set battle earlier today.  Over the years, Dulko has had much more success as a doubles player, but owns her share of singles upsets as well.  My family and I first fell for her during a night match against Jelena Jankovic in Miami.  My mother and grandmother joined me in rooting on Gigi to upset the sassy Serb, and Dulko did not disappoint.  Today's win over Sam Stosur has to rank up there with the biggest wins of Gisela's decade-long career.  She may be a petite Argentinian who seems overmatched against the taller and bigger girls on the circuit, but she fights hard and looks good doing it.  Kudos to her on slaying a giant.  Hopefully, she can keep the momentum going and make a deep run at this year's French Open.


Yesterday, the ravishing Aranxta Rus stunned one of the tournament favorites and number 2 seed, Kim Clijsters. It was by far the biggest win of Rus' young career.  The twenty-year-old Dutch woman is just starting to find her form on tour.  As the above picture can attest to, she's tall and tan and quite beautiful.  She first appeared on my radar two years ago in Miami.  I watched her play another young cutie on the rise, Magdalena Rybarikova, on an outer court with about seven other people in the stands.  The girls slugged it out in the first round clash, with Rybarikova squeezing out the victory, 7-5 in the third.  I found myself rooting for Aranxta, partly because Magdalena seemed a little bratty, but mainly because Rus was better looking.  After the match, Rus was waiting for her coach, standing by herself on the grounds, and I couldn't  resist the temptation to tell her she battled hard.  Though she was distraught after losing, she thanked me and I went on my way.  Since then, I've followed both Rus and Rybarikova as they've struggled to rise through the ranks (Rybarikova is currently #62, Rus is #114).  Both players seem to have the potential to combine their talent and looks and find stardom on the tour, but it's a tough game.  Most girls don't make it.  I love Kim Clijsters, and often root for her despite the fact that she's not that hot, but it was extremely satisfying to see Aranxta Rus shock the tournament by breaking through and upsetting Kimmie.  Now the rest of the tennis world gets to make the acquaintance of this captivating young girl from the Netherlands that caught my attention on a sunny day in South Florida.

Congratulations to Aranxta Rus and Gisela Dulko.  Beautiful wins.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

THERE'S A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN

Though both the official rankings and unofficial clay court power rankings still have Rafael Nadal at the top, Novak Djokovic is now the best tennis player in the world.  Including two Davis Cup wins late in 2010 to help secure the trophy for Serbia, Djokovic has won 39 straight matches.  He won the year's first major in Australia and has not lost in 2011.  With his most recent victory on Sunday, he has also beaten Nadal in four straight Masters Series finals -- Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid, and Rome.  



Djokovic has drastically improved his serve (the only real weakness in his game) and exponentially improved his physical conditioning.  The Novak Djokovic who struggled with breathing problems and retired early from tough matches no longer exists.  The current Novak Djokovic seems unbeatable.  His movement around the court is incredible, outrunning the fleet-footed Nadal, who is regarded as one of the most athletic men to ever play the game.  


Djokovic's shotmaking and decision-making have been near perfect.  And most importantly, his arrogance has turned to self-belief.  With confidence oozing out of every pore in his body, one can easily read in his demeanor that his mind is strong, that his will is unshakable, and that he somehow he knows that he is going to win every match he plays.  John McEnroe, who holds the longest win streak to start a calendar year (42 matches in 1984), says he thinks Djokovic's streak is already more impressive than his own.  Given the deeper pool of talent and physical demands of the modern game, McEnroe believes Nole's run is unprecedented.  And when John McEnroe talks tennis, everyone listens, because he may just be the game's smartest commentator and biggest advocate.


Sunday's final in Rome was a spectacular match.  Though the scoreline might indicate a fairly routine 6-4, 6-4 victory for Novak Djokovic, it was anything but.  From the opening serve of the match, Nole and Rafa played tennis of the highest quality.  Only a few key points separated them.  But almost all of those big points went to Djokovic.  Rafael Nadal appeared frustrated at times, unable to come up with the goods when he needed it most and unable to put the ball past Djokovic's amazing defense.  With loses in four finals in some of the biggest tournaments of the year outside the Slams, Nadal knows he is no longer king of the mountain.  In interviews, he admitted that losing the number one ranking is a forgone conclusion.  Djokovic will most likely take over the top spot after the French Open, regardless of who wins the title.


Personally, I feel for Rafael Nadal.  He spent so much time at #2 when Roger Federer was the dominant man in the sport, and now he finds himself right back in that familiar position on the second step of the podium, only this time with Novak Djokovic standing on the top rung.  All this is happening at a time when Federer's considerable talents have waned and planted him firmly in the #3 slot.  Both Nadal and Djokovic have been defeating Roger with relative ease this season. This should be Nadal's time to dominate tennis.  But last year may have been the closest Rafael gets in his career to a stranglehold on the men's game.  He won 3 out of 4 Grand Slams, and gave it a great run in Australia to make it 4 in a row (though it would not have been a "Calendar Slam").  Despite a slight sadness for Rafa, because he is the player I root for the hardest since Andre Agassi retired, I am grateful that tennis's next great rivalry is upon us.  Though Djokovic has won all four of the Masters finals they've played against each other in the past few months, each of the matches has been a hotly contested affair.  I was lucky enough to attend the final in Miami, and witnessed a stupendous duel between two jawdroppingly awesome players.  As has been the case in their battles, a mere two or three points decided the match, with the Serb just a little bit better than the Spaniard when it mattered most.


As I imagine Uncle Toni will do, I would tell Rafa to keep his head up if I had the chance to speak to him directly.  He is a brilliant striker of the ball and a master tactician.  He is a champion who has been knocked down before and gotten up to answer the bell for the next round.  Djokovic has defeated him two times in a row on clay, but both of those matches were best 2 out of 3.  At the French, Nole is going to have to win 3 sets to wrest the title from Nadal, who is considered one of, if not the greatest clay court player to ever swing a racquet.  It is a credit to Djokovic and the level he has raised his game to that the feat even seems possible.  As a fan of Nadal, I can only hope he finds a way to crack the code and exact revenge.  As a fan of tennis, I eagerly anticipate the prospect of another monumental clash that will surely be etched in the annals of the sport's history.  Either way, I can't lose.